The World's Largest Modern & Contemporary Prints & Editions Platform

After
Second Version Of The Triptych

These prints reproduce the panels of Francis Bacon’s Second Version Of The Triptych (1944), itself a reworking of a 1944 painting. Replete with Bacon’s grotesque humanoid figures, these works consolidate his art’s mythology, in which these forms symbolise numerous traumas— from war to guilt surrounding the artist’s sexuality.

Sell Your Art
with Us

Join Our Network of Collectors. Buy, Sell and Track Demand

Submission takes less than 2 minutes & there's zero obligation to sell
The Only Dedicated Print Market IndexTracking 48,500 Auction HistoriesSpecialist Valuations at the Click of a Button Build Your PortfolioMonitor Demand & Supply in Network Sell For Free to our 25,000 Members

Meaning & Analysis

This collection of prints takes after a 1988 painting by Irish-born British artist Francis Bacon. Entitled Second Version Of The Triptych 1944, the painting is a reworking of the artist’s 1944 piece, Three Studies For Figures At The Base Of A Crucifixion. The latter of these works, produced during the final year of World War II, is a particularly visceral painting; replete with semi-anthropomorphic, semi-humanoid forms, for many it serves as a shocking visualisation of both the horrors of war and the ruined state of the world — and humanity — in its aftermath. Perhaps the most well-known feature of Bacon’s œuvre, the work was deeply shocking to those who saw it when it was first exhibited at London’s Lefevre Gallery in 1945. No typical crucifixion, the triptych mixes Christian and Ancient Greek traditions, the distorted forms appearing in each segment referring directly to the Eumedes – or ‘furies’ – of Aeschylus’s tragedy, Oresteia.

The 1944 painting is often credited, alongside Bacon’s Study After Velázquez’s Portrait Of Pope Innocent X (1953), with kickstarting the artist’s long and successful career. The 1988 reworking of this tripartite crucifixion image, then, constitutes a kind of painterly retrospection on Bacon’s part; revisiting the same odd, spherical, and distinctly grey creatures that adorned the 1944 painting, Bacon nonetheless depicts them on a much larger scale - the 1988 copy being almost twice the size of the original. Other minor points of discontinuity are apparent: replacing the orange colour of the 1944 painting is a dark, crimson hue that makes up much of the background to the work’s left and right panels. In the centre panel, a bulbous form with a long neck – and a set of human-like teeth – stands atop an abstracted plinth or stool. Behind and below it stands one of Bacon’s signature framing devices: an at once flat and three-dimensional conical of dark red paint.

The reasoning behind Bacon’s creation of this similarly monstrous 1988 copy of a 1944 painting is unclear. Three Studies For Figures At The Base Of A Crucifixion (1944) might have been inspired by Bacon’s time as an air raid warden in Blitz-era London, as some have speculated; however, the theme of the crucifixion had been a feature of Bacon’s œuvre since as early as 1933 when, at the age of 23, he painted the oil canvases Crucifixion and Crucifixion With Skull. Together with the blatant sexual themes posed by the figures in both the 1944 and 1988 triptychs, this work perhaps relates to Bacon’s persistent feelings of guilt about his sexuality. A repeated act of heavily staged sacrifice, could Second Version Of The Triptych 1944 have been designed to rid Bacon of his anguish?

10 Facts About Francis Bacon's After Second Version Of The Triptych

Distorted, abstract creature against a red background

After Second Version Of The Triptych 1944 (left panel) © Francis Bacon 1988

1. After Second Version Of The Triptych is a reworking of Bacon’s earlier depiction of Christ’s crucifixion

In After Second Version Of The Triptych, Bacon revisits his famous earlier work, Three Studies for Figures at the Base of a Crucifixion. Originally created in the aftermath of World War II, the original triptych shocked audiences with its grotesque, semi-human figures and its reflection on the devastation of war. In 1988, Bacon reimagined the piece with new compositional elements, while maintaining its nightmarish essence.

Abstract creature against a red backdrop

After Second Version Of The Triptych 1944 (right panel) © Francis Bacon 1988

2. Bacon’s triptych draws on Greek mythology

Both versions of the triptych reference the Eumenides, or Furies, from Aeschylus’s Greek tragedy Oresteia. These mythological creatures, symbolic of vengeance and retribution, take the place of Christ’s mourners in Bacon’s reworking of the crucifixion scene, combining Christian iconography with ancient Greek mythology in a uniquely disturbing exploration of human suffering.

Abstract figure lies in a dark doorway

Triptych August 1972 (centre panel) © Francis Bacon 1972

3. Bacon’s 1988 version enlarges the horror of his original work

Bacon’s Second Version of the Triptych 1944 is nearly twice the size of the original, amplifying the terrifying presence of the twisted creatures. This monumental scale evokes a greater sense of dread and isolation, making the viewer feel overwhelmed by the strange, spherical beings that dominate the panels.

Abstract figure sits on a chair against an orange backdrop

Triptych 1983 (left panel) © Francis Bacon 1983

4. There is a noticeable shift in colour in Second Version of the Triptych 1944

While the original 1944 painting was dominated by an intense burnt orange background, the 1988 version introduces a deep crimson backdrop. This shift in colour intensifies the painting's dark atmosphere and reinforces its themes of violence and suffering.

Abstract figure holding an umbrella sits on the beach

The Metropolitan Triptych (right panel) © Francis Bacon 1981

5. In After Second Version of the Triptych 1944, Bacon subverts the traditional crucifixion scene

By replacing Christ and his grieving disciples with monstrous anthropomorphic figures, Bacon uses these symbols of vengeance to represent humanity’s darker instincts. Bacon's version removes the element of redemption, offering instead a brutal vision of suffering and anguish, which reimagines the crucifixion as a symbol of torment and punishment, rather than salvation.

Distorted pope figure sits on a grand chair

Study For A Portrait Of Pope Innocent X © Francis Bacon 1989

6. Bacon’s triptych structure echoes Christian iconography

Although the content of Bacon's work is far from typical religious art, the triptych format itself recalls the structure of Christian altarpieces, traditionally used to depict the Holy Trinity or the Crucifixion. By using this three-panel arrangement, Bacon invokes the sacred format but replaces the divine figures with grotesque, bestial forms, suggesting a world abandoned by grace and consumed by violence. This contrast underscores the idea that in the aftermath of war and personal suffering, even religious iconography can be transformed into a reflection of horror and despair.

Distorted figure using a wash basin

Figure At Wash Basin © Francis Bacon 1976

7. Bacon’s triptych was influenced from his experiences of blitz-era London

Some scholars have suggested that Bacon’s original 1944 painting, as well as its reworked 1988 version, may have been inspired by his experiences as an air raid warden during the London Blitz. The chaotic, violent imagery in these works reflects the trauma of a world devastated by war, a theme that permeates much of Bacon’s art.

Distorted figure standing in a dark doorway

Study For Portrait Of John Edwards © Francis Bacon 1987

8. Bacon re-worked his triptych as lithographs in homage to Pierre Boulez

The 1988 reworking, Second Version of the Triptych 1944, was also turned into lithographic prints. These were produced in limited editions, with one set created as a tribute to French composer Pierre Boulez. The lithographs, almost life-size versions of the original, maintain the haunting presence of Bacon's creatures.

Abstract male head

After Study Of Portrait Head Based On The Life Mask Of William Blake © Francis Bacon 1991

9. Bacon deliberately amplified themes of isolation in his 1988 triptych

While the creatures in the original 1944 triptych are tightly packed into a claustrophobic space, the 1988 version isolates them within a vast red void. This shift heightens the sense of their loneliness and torment, as the figures appear to sink into the desolate, oppressive atmosphere of the painting.

Distorted, abstract nude figure

Triptych 1991 (right panel) © Francis Bacon 1992

10. Bacon’s triptych magnifies his ability to blur reality with the unfamiliar

Bacon’s skill in blending familiar human features with monstrous forms creates a disturbing ‘familiar unfamiliarity’ throughout the triptych. In the right panel, the creature's gaping mouth, jagged ribs, and eerily human teeth evoke a sense of both recognition and horror, making the viewer confront unsettling reflections of their own form and existence.